Friday, February 5, 2010

Urgent Message:

On Jan 29, 2010 ... The Obama administration announced that it is nominating acting DEA Administrator Michele Leonhart to head the agency.

 Ms. Leonhart Career Highlights:
  • Holdover from the Bush Administration when marijuana raids were at a fever pitch. 
  • She denied a cultivation permit to the University of Massachusetts at Amherst, thus impeding research into the medical uses of cannabis.
  • Under the Bush Administration, then Deputy administrator Leonhart, under Karen Tandy conducted scores of raids on medical marijuana dispensaries, probably over 200.
  • Michele Leonhart, Drug Enforcement Chief, Spent More Than $123,000 To Charter Private Jet To Colombia.
I believe Ms. Leonhart should not lead the DEA. She does not understand medicinal marijuana,  nor the needs of the marijuana community. Based on her past performance and experience in the Bush administration, her appointment must be blocked!

My friends at change.org have provided a petition and further information regarding this issue.

I urge you to please sign their petition here.

Thanks,
Hollywood Caregiver

Friday, January 22, 2010

Who Needs Clinical Trials?

"There are three kinds of lies: There are lies, there are outrageous lies, and there are statistics."
19th Century British Prime Minister
Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881)




There has been no scientific studies to validate the use of Marijuana for ADHD, an illness which appears to be widespread with our children. This is a truthful statement. There are also no scientific studies validating the use of marijuana for any disease or ailment. This is also true. All the stories of medicinal marijuana benefits are anecdotal. Anecdotes are really stories or fairy tales and nothing more. Anecdotal evidence is termed untrustworthy by the scientific community.  Physicians say we must approve drugs through evidence based clinical trials.

The Food and Drug Administration or FDA has set guidelines for medications in the United States. Studies are conducted. Double blind experiments are evaluated. Researchers conduct lab tests and validate all the data with statistics. Statistics prove everything. So anecdotal evidence becomes scientific with the rigorous testing and publishing of a scientific paper. Currently, empiric evidence appears to be useless knowledge.

No Statistics = no evidence = no paper = no new drugs.

You see marijuana is classified as a Schedule I narcotic by the U.S. Government which essentially prohibits any studies or trials. To ban the testing of medical Marijuana by the Federal Government while opining the lack of evidence as to the drug's efficacy, makes perfect sense to me. It really does. To ban any alternative medicinal method that shows promise also makes sense to me. The Government maintains a clinical trial prohibition for the drugs they don't want, and facilitates the trials for the drugs they wish to move forward, this also makes sense.

Medical marijuana has been used for some 8,000 years as a medicine by most ancient cultures. However, no paper was ever written. It just worked.

However, let's stop and consider some evidence about Ritalin which is used in the treatment of ADHD.

Between 1990 and 2000 there were 186 deaths from methylphenidate documented to the FDA MedWatch program, a voluntary reporting system, the figures which represent a maximum of 10 to 20% of the actual incidence.

In the US, physicians generate 2 million prescriptions for ADHD drugs for children every month and 1 million for adults.

We weren't told that The Drug Enforcement Administration had classified Methylphenidate (Ritalin) as a Schedule II drug, equivalent to Cocaine.

Did you know that schools receive supplemental funds from state as well as federal govt for every child labeled and drugged? This plainly demonstrates a possible "financial incentive" for educational institutions to label as well as drug teens. Additionally , it backs up the escalating rise/increase in the marking and drugging which has taken place within the last ten years within our educational institutions.

Were you aware that parents getting welfare income from the U.S. Government could possibly get extra cash for every child they have labeled and drugged? In this way, countless lower socio-economic parents (many times single mothers) may be reeled into the drugging through these economic offers waved in front of them in hard times, making standard of living alterations feasible.

Did you know that through tagging your youngster with ADHD, you will be essentially labeling them with a mental illness listed in the DSM-IV, the unscientific billing bible for psychiatry?

Are you aware that a child taking a psycho-tropic, psycho-stimulant drugs like Ritalin after the age of 12 is ineligible to get military service?

Do you realize that groups such as CHADD  and others available to parents are being supported monetarily by pharmaceutical companies? It is a red flag and demonstrates a conflict of interest in the role that these organizations have concerning our childrens health and welfare.

Were you aware that there are reports including the Berkeley Study in which contends that Ritalin in addition to other stimulants further raise the danger associated with drug abuse? Because of the Wall Street Journal, Monday, May 17, 1999 by Marilyn Chase: "Nadine Lambert, a professor of education, observed almost 500 students for 26 years. She argues that exposure to Ritalin makes the brain much more subject to the addictive power of cocaine and doubles the risk of abuse."


It's your choice. Follow the anecdotal evidence which demonstrates marijuana's use and effectiveness  for 8,000 years... or follow Big Business. You choose!

Tell me what you think?
HollywoodCaregiverBlog@yahoo.com

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Medical Marijuana – Stop Spread of Breast Cancer


Sean D. McAllister, PhD
Email: Mcallis@cpmcri.org

Introduction

Our research team is studying the potential of the endocannabinoid system to control cell fate with the goal of developing therapeutic interventions for aggressive cancers. This newly discovered biological system can be regulated by many different classes of cannabinoid compounds that work through specific cellular receptors. The cloned cannabinoid receptors have been termed cannabinoid 1 (CB1) and (CB2).

∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a mixed CB1 and CB2 receptor agonist, is the primary active constituent of Cannabis sativa and is currently being used in a clinical trial for the treatment of aggressive recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Cannabinoids are also being used in clinical trials for purposes unrelated to their direct anticancer activity. The compounds have been reported to be well tolerated during chronic oral and systemic administration. In addition to Δ9-THC, cannabidiol (CBD), cannabinol (CBN) and cannabigerol (CBG) are also present in reasonable quantities in Cannabis. CBN has low affinity for CB1 and CB2 receptors, whereas the non-psychotropic cannabinoids, CBD and CBG, have negligible affinity for the cloned receptors. We have determined that these additional cannabinoids are also effective and inhibiting aggressive cancers. Importantly, we have discovered in vitro that a synergistic increase in the antiproliferative and apoptotic activity of cannabinoids can be produced by combining specific ratios of CB1 and CB2 receptors agonists with non-psychotropic cannabinoids.

We are currently determining the molecular mechanism that may explain the synergistic increase in anticancer activity that is observed with the combination treatments. We are also studying whether this combination strategy will lead to greater antitumor activity in vivo.

In addition to the combination therapy project, we are working in collaboration with Dr. Pierre Desprez to develop novel inhibitors of Id-1 using cannabinoid compounds. Id-1 is a helix-loop-helix protein that acts as an inhibitor of basic helix-loop-helix transcription factors that control cell differentiation, development and carcinogenesis. Past research of Id-1 expression in normal and cancerous breast cells, as well as in mouse mammary glands and in human breast cancer biopsies, demonstrated that increased Id-1 expression was associated with a proliferative and invasive phenotype. Specifically, it was found that Id-1 was constitutively expressed at a high level in aggressive breast cancer cells and human biopsies, and that aggressiveness was reverted in vitro and in vivo when Id-1 expression was targeted using antisense technology. Importantly, we have recently discovered that CBD, a nontoxic cannabinoid that lacks psychoactivity, can inhibit Id-1 gene expression in metastatic breast cancer cells and consequently their aggressive phenotype. The down-regulation of expression was the result of the inhibition of the endogenous Id-1 promoter and corresponding mRNA and protein levels. CBD and compounds based off of its structure can therefore potentially be used as therapeutic agents. CBD also inhibits breast cancer metastasis in vivo.

Based off of our recent findings, we are currently involved in 1) developing novel CBD analogs for the treat of aggressive breast cancers 2) discovering the detailed mechanisms through which cannabinoid compounds regulate Id-1 expression.

HollywoodCaregiver@yahoo.com

Monday, January 11, 2010

A Great Documentary on Marijuana

Saturday, January 9, 2010

Lawmaker wants to license Medical Marijuana Caregivers

Associated Press just released the following story about licensing medical marijuana caregivers. In it, State lawmakers want to license medical Marijuana caregivers as they do other professions such as physicians and nurses. This new burden comes after a long list of tasks in 2009, aimed at obstructing the medical marijuana movement in many States. Still, Is the licensing of Medical marijuana caregivers really a burden?

I would argue that some form of State licensing is the only way our 'Industry' will be looked at seriously. State licensing will elevate the marijuana trade from a street skill, to a qualified profession where it belongs. Too much focus is placed on legitimizing medical marijuana through the tax and regulate proponents. This is a political move brought on by the current Federal and State budget woes, and it's short term thinking at best. Our industry will be legitimized, and its foundation secured, through a professional designation. Marijuana certification through coursework mastery and State licensure as a medical professional, is the Grail we have been seeking.

Certification will do more towards legitimizing our profession than any other method ever could. Marijuana Certification will open up a world of opportunities for an individual seeking employment in our trade. And the branding and stigmatization of our industry and patients will be lifted once and for all. While most of our industry is focused on gaining legitimacy through cannabis taxation, Cannabis certification is the answer.
 
“Caregiving should be a sophisticated medical skill,” Sen. Chris Romer said. I wholeheartedly agree with the Senator.

The certified Marijuana professional will supplement our health care system by providing excellence in patient care. Marijuana Caregiving is a complex medical skill with many mastery areas required. In my opinion, the course work should include cannabis history, horticulture, therapeutics, ailments, dosage and titration, Federal law, and general care giving skills.

Since I have yet to see the final legislation, I will hold my final judgement on what the State legislators ultimately come up with. The one thing I will say is Senator Romer is serving his constituents and the medical marijuana debate, seriously and logically. Writing good legislation, with the interest of the patients first, is always the way to go. The Senator gets it. He really gets it.

Tell me what you think...

Hollywoodcaregiver@yahoo.com
http://www.hollywoodcaregiverblog.com/

Marijuana Caregiver Certification Story


Bill Summary

(Note: This summary applies to this bill as introduced and does not necessarily reflect any amendments that may be subsequently adopted.)

Section 1. The bill creates the medical marijuana licensing authority (state licensing authority) in the department of revenue. The state licensing authority grants, refuses, and renews a medical marijuana clinic license or medical marijuana grower license after the licensee has received a local license. The state licensing authority also administers all aspects of medical marijuana licensure, including rulemaking. Many of the functions and duties of the state licensing authority are similar to those held by the state licensing authority for alcoholic beverages. There will be 3 types of licenses: One license for medical marijuana clinics serving 300 or fewer patients; one license for medical marijuana clinics prior draft serving more than 300 patients, but fewer than 1,500; and a medical marijuana grower license. A licensed medical marijuana grower must transact all sales using an electronic payment method.

Section 2. The bill makes illegally selling or distributing 2 ounces or more of marijuana that comes from a medical marijuana source a class 4 felony.

Section 3. The department of public health and environment will promulgate new rules related to standards for issuing registry identification cards, procedures for primary caregiver applicants, documentation for physicians who prescribe medical marijuana, sanctions for physicians who violate the act, and other services that a primary caregiver may provide and the minimum required levels for those services.

A patient may change his or her primary caregiver no more than 4 times during a given year.

A group of 3 patients and primary caregivers may form a cooperative for the purpose of cultivating and exchanging medical marijuana.

A chiropractor or registered nurse who is a registered primary caregiver may treat up to 20% of his or her patients with medical marijuana without having a medical marijuana clinic license. A physical therapist or optometrist who is a registered primary caregiver may treat up to 20 patients with medical marijuana without having a medical marijuana clinic license.

An individual who is permitted to use medical marijuana must have in his or her possession a registry identification card when possessing a usable form of marijuana.

A physician who certifies that a patient can use medical marijuana may not receive remuneration from a primary caregiver, medical marijuana clinic, or medical marijuana grower related to medical marijuana.

Local governments may enact zoning requirements related to medical marijuana.

The bill creates a medical marijuana review board (board) that will consider requests by nonveteran patients under 21 years of age who want to be registered medical marijuana patients. For a patient who is under 21 years of age to become a registered medical marijuana patient, a majority of the board must determine that the patient has a debilitating medical condition and could benefit from the use of medical marijuana.

Friday, January 8, 2010

15 Greatest Proponents of Marijuana Legalization

Marijuana is called many names, across different cultures, largely due to the fact that it’s been around for over five thousand years. An estimated 162 million people in the world use cannabis every year, so it shouldn’t be surprising that so many big names touch the green stuff too. Some celebrities are more forthcoming with their love of weed than others — ahem, Willie Nelson — but you might be surprised at a few that fight for the drug’s legalization. Here are 15 of the greatest proponents of marijuana legalization.

Bill Maher


Social critic, comedian and television host Bill Maher gets passionate about what he supports. Along with gay marriage and PETA, he supports the legalization of marijuana quite publicly — although that’s just his style. He’s even on the advisory board for NORML, and on the 2009 debut of his HBO show Real Time he proposed just how to solve the economic crisis: by legalizing marijuana.





Adam Carolla



Radio shock jock and television personality Adam Carolla is not a pot smoker anymore, so he says, but that doesn’t stop him from supporting the cause — he’s even joined the MPP’s advisory board. He’s said that pot will eventually win the fight: “It has to… We don’t have a bigger fish to fry than pot? It’s going to happen. It’s just going to happen. It will come to pass,” stated Carolla.



Peter Coyote


Peter Coyote, American Renaissance man, has dabbled in acting, directing, and authoring books as well as screenplays. Born to a Jewish family, he has since converted to Zen Buddhism — so it’s understandable that he has a wide cultural experience and mindset. He supports marijuana and believes that “jailing people for the mild alteration of their consciousness will appear to future generations as cruel and draconian as the tortures of the Inquisition appear to us today. May the reputations of today’s jailers suffer the same fate as Torquemada’s reputation today.” Strong words.

Jack Black


Funny man Jack Black has entertained us with the likes of both film and music. In a recent interview, he spoke of his own drug use — trying acid and cocaine as early as the ninth grade. When it comes to pot — he still smokes — but it’s now “an occasional celebratory jay… not a wake-and-bake scenario anymore at all.” Either way, he smokes it, supports it, and is on the MPP advisory board.



Jack Nicholson


Actor, film director, and producer Jack Nicholson is so good at what he does, that he’s been nominated for 12 Academy Awards, and he’s even won two of them. He’s a big voice in Hollywood, so when he says something — people listen. “My point of view, while extremely cogent, is unpopular… That the repressive nature of the legalities vis-a-vis drugs are destroying the legal system and corrupting the police system.” Cogent may be an understatement, the man can speak, but what the movement lacks in numbers, guys like Nicholson make up for in words.


Jennifer Aniston




While some may be surprised at the fact that American sweetheart and actress Jennifer Aniston smokes bud, she’s admitted her love for it on several occasions. While she was with actor Brad Pitt, they apparently smoked all the time. Now she will “Enjoy it once in a while — There is nothing wrong with that.” She’s been caught by the paparazzi before, smoking in private — we’re sure she’d enjoy the legalization.







     Jesse Ventura                                   Retired professional wrestler turned tv show host Jesse Ventura has dabbled in so many different things in his 58 years, no wonder he looks like a wreck now. He’s known to express his support for medical marijuana, but is even more adamant about his support for the complete legalization of the drug. His mother lived through Prohibition, so he took some pointers from her and believes that:

“The war on drugs is a failure for the same reasons Prohibition was a failure… Just imagine if we could find some way for addicts to get their drugs cheaply, safely, and legally. The bottom would drop out of the illegal drug market. We’d see a huge drop in organized and violent crime.”

Johnny Depp




Award-winning actor Johnny Depp has quite an interesting take on drugs, especially marijuana. He was known to take quite a few drugs in his day — so he speaks from experience. In fact, he’s stated that he wants his kids to get drugs from him if they’re going to try them, instead of some other dealer. He’s been criticized for the statements, but he holds strong and maintains his support for legalization.



Joycelyn Elders, M.D.



Dr. Joycelyn Elders, 15th Surgeon General of the United States, went on to become a professor of pediatrics after she was fired by former President Clinton for her radical views. And by “radical” views, we mean the support of condom distribution in schools, abortion rights and suggesting the legalization of drugs to reduce the crime rate. She’s on the advisory board for the MPP and supports them “because it is a professional organization attempting to change our destructive marijuana laws.”



Kirsten Dunst


Actress Kirsten Dunst, who gained international fame with her role in Spiderman as Mary Jane Watson, is known for her views on weed. Not only does she like the drug, but she believes that “America’s view on weed is ridiculous” and that it would make the world “a better place” should weed be legalized.






Michael Bloomberg


Michael Bloomberg, current Mayor of New York City, has smoked weed before — and “enjoyed it.” Back in April 2002 he was featured in an ad that some campaigners had started circulating in protest to Bloomberg arresting pot-smokers. He wasn’t thrilled that they were using his name and words, but it still stands that he’s fond of the drug. We think he’s in denial for political reasons.





Morgan Freeman




Another award-winning actor in support of legalization, Morgan Freeman still smokes to this day at the ripe age of 72. In an interview with the UK newspaper The Guardian, the legendary actor told reporters he had given up his use of hard drugs, but that he would never quit his relationship with Mary Jane. In fact, he referred to marijuana as “God’s own weed.”





Richard Branson


Sir Richard Branson, British industrialist and chairman of Virgin Group, has a net worth of over 2.5 Billion dollars to go with his douchey attitude — but in all fairness, he’s a good douche. He’s one of the world’s richest people, but he spends his money in aggressive, forward-thinking ways. Just look at Virgin Galactic. Staying true to his out-of-the-box thinking, Branson supports the legalization of marijuana — and said he would even sell it in Virgin stores if it were openly available.



Stephen King

Stephen King, writer of contemporary horror and suspense, is all for legalization. Instead of avoiding the topic, as many celebrities and politicians do, he embraces it. He thinks that “marijuana should not only be legal [but that] it should be a cottage industry. It would be wonderful for the state of Maine. There’s some pretty good homegrown dope.” If weed were legalized, he also believes that it would be even better, due to the use of commercial fertilizers and greenhouses.


Brad Pitt

Brad Pitt, actor and film producer, calls himself an artist when it comes to rolling a joint. Apparently he has stopped smoking recently because it turns him “into a doughnut,” but he’s been known to publicly support marijuana — he smoked on several movie sets, including Ocean’s Twelve and Thelma and Louise. He wants pot legalized as much as he wants gay marriage legalized, and he won’t stop supporting either until changes are made.



Originally published by Editor at glamour-news.blogspot.com

City shouldn't sell cannabis or should they?

A week ago, I wrote an article regarding the issue of State controlled liquor and cannabis sales. Well, it appears some cities are getting into the cannabis fray. The city of Redding, Ca. wants to refill in empty coffers, by setting up its own Medical Marijuana dispensary. Not only that, it wants to remove the competition by prohibiting sales and establishing itself as the cities only supplier. It must be nice to have Governmental control.

Can you say Sherman Antitrust Act?

I guess local cities need to be reminded of anti-competition laws. Honestly, I would like to know how serious this suggestion is from the city council of Redding, as there appears to be a similar pattern in all levels of Government around the United States toward more Socialist controls. What's this new idea of governments running everything? Last time I checked, a city's function is to tax and regulate its incorporated areas, not be in the marijuana business.

Hey councilmen! Think about this for a moment. Even if you somehow maintain the rights to do this, which I doubt, customers still need to support your dispensary. Considering the way in which your dispensary is to be established, that might prove difficult. I know I would never buy from you!

Last time I checked, we live in America, And voting with my pocketbook and my cash rules! So, good luck city council of Redding, can you spell ... bankrupt!

Tell me what you think
HollywoodCaregiver@yahoo.com